Resistance TrainingrctRCT1999

Circuit weight training and its effects on excess postexercise oxygen consumption.

Medicine and science in sports and exercise

confidence

Key findings

Shorter rest (20s) increased 1h EPOC, but longer rest (60s) yielded greater total energy expenditure including exercise.

View source on PubMed (PMID 10589865) ↗

Sample size
7
Population
Healthy men
Dosing
Two circuits of eight upper/lower body exercises, 20 reps at 75% of 20RM, with 20-s or 60-s rest intervals
Duration
Two single sessions (acute)
Route
exercise intervention
Blinding
not_reported
Controls
none
Drug class
exercise modality

Measured endpoints

  • 1 h excess postexercise oxygen consumption (EPOC)Increasedmetabolic
    significanteffect: 10.3 +/- 0.57 L (20 RI) vs 7.40 +/- 0.39 L (60 RI)
  • Net caloric expenditure during 1 h recoveryIncreasedmetabolic
    significanteffect: 51.51 +/- 2.84 (20 RI) vs 37.00 +/- 1.97 kcal (60 RI)
  • Total gross energy expenditure (exercise + 1 h recovery)Decreasedmetabolic
    significanteffect: 242.21 kcal (20 RI) vs 277.23 kcal (60 RI)
Full abstract

There is a paucity of research concerning energy expenditure during and after circuit weight training (CWT). There is evidence that duration of rest between sets affects metabolic responses to resistive exercise. The purpose of the study was to determine the effect of rest-interval duration upon the magnitude of 1 h of excess postexercise oxygen consumption (EPOC). Seven healthy men completed two randomized circuit weight training sessions using 20-s and 60-s rest intervals (20 RI, 60 RI). Sessions included two circuits of eight upper and lower body resistive exercises in which 20 repetitions were performed at 75% of a previously determined 20 repetition maximum. The 1 h EPOC of 10.3 +/- 0.57 L for the 20 RI session was significantly higher than 7.40 +/- 0.39 L for the 60 RI session. The net caloric expenditure during 1 h of recovery from the 20 RI session was significantly higher than that of the 60 RI session (51.51 +/- 2.84 vs 37.00 +/- 1.97 kcal); however, total gross energy expenditure (exercise + 1 h recovery) was significantly greater for the 60 RI protocol (277.23 kcal) than the 20 RI protocol (242.21 kcal). Data demonstrate that shortening the rest interval duration will increase the magnitude of 1 h EPOC from CWT; however, the exercise + recovery caloric costs from CWT are slightly greater for a longer rest interval duration protocol. These data suggest that total caloric cost be taken into account for CWT.

Research information, not medical advice. StudyKit summarizes published studies to help you understand your protocol. It does not diagnose, treat, or replace a clinician. Talk to a qualified provider before changing anything you take.