RapamycinRCT2000

Efficacy of sirolimus compared with azathioprine for reduction of acute renal allograft rejection: a randomised multicentre study. The Rapamune US Study Group.

Lancet (London, England)

confidence

Key findings

Sirolimus reduced occurrence and severity of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection vs azathioprine with no increase in infection or malignancy.

View source on PubMed (PMID 10963197) ↗

Sample size
719 (sirolimus 2 mg n=284, 5 mg n=274, azathioprine n=161)
Population
Recipients of primary HLA-mismatched cadaveric or living-donor renal allografts with initial graft function
Dosing
Sirolimus 2 mg or 5 mg daily; azathioprine; all with cyclosporin and prednisone
Duration
12 months
Route
oral
Blinding
double_blind
Controls
active_comparator
Drug class
mTOR inhibitor

Measured endpoints

  • efficacy failure (composite: biopsy-confirmed acute rejection, graft loss, or death)Decreasedimmune
    significanteffect: 2 mg 18.7% vs azathioprine 32.3%; 5 mg 16.8% vs 32.3%
  • biopsy-confirmed acute rejection episodesDecreasedimmune
    significanteffect: 2 mg 16.9%; 5 mg 12.0%; azathioprine 29.8%
  • graft survivalNo changerenal
    not_significanteffect: 97.2%, 96.0%, 98.1%
  • patient survivalNo changelongevity
    not_significanteffect: 94.7%, 92.7%, 93.8%
  • time to first acute rejection episodeImprovedimmune
    not_reportedeffect: delayed in sirolimus groups
  • frequency of moderate and severe histological grades of rejectionDecreasedimmune
    not_reported
  • rates of infectionNo changesafety
    not_significanteffect: similar in all groups
  • rates of malignant disordersNo changecancer
    not_significanteffect: similar in all groups
Full abstract

Acute rejection episodes after renal transplantation are an important clinical challenge, despite use of multidrug immunosuppressive regimens. We did a prospective, multicentre, randomised, double-blind trial to investigate the impact of the addition of sirolimus, compared with azathioprine, to a cyclosporin and prednisone regimen. 719 recipients of primary HLA-mismatched cadaveric or living-donor renal allografts who displayed initial graft function were randomly assigned, after transplantation, sirolimus 2 mg daily (n=284) or 5 mg daily (n=274), or azathioprine (n=161). We assessed the primary composite endpoint of efficacy failure, occurrence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection episodes, graft loss, or death, and various secondary endpoints that characterise these episodes at 6 months and 12 months. Analyses were done by intention to treat. The rate of efficacy failure at 6 months was lower in the two sirolimus groups (2 mg 18.7%, p=0.002; 5 mg 16.8%, p<0.001) than in the azathioprine group (32.3%). The frequency of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection episodes was also lower (2 mg 16.9%, p=0.002; 5 mg 12.0%, p<0.001; azathioprine 29.8%). At 12 months, survival was similar in all groups for grafts (97.2%, 96.0%, and 98.1%) and patients (94.7%, 92.7%, and 93.8%). Patients on sirolimus showed a delay in the time to first acute rejection episode and decreased frequency of moderate and severe histological grades of rejection episodes and related antibody treatment, compared with the azathioprine group. Rates of infection and malignant disorders were similar in all groups. Use of sirolimus reduced occurrence and severity of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection episodes with no increase in complications. Further studies are needed to establish the optimum doses for the combined regimen.

Research information, not medical advice. StudyKit summarizes published studies to help you understand your protocol. It does not diagnose, treat, or replace a clinician. Talk to a qualified provider before changing anything you take.