Rapamycinobservational2001

Influence of hepatic impairment on everolimus pharmacokinetics: implications for dose adjustment.

Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics

confidence

Key findings

Moderate hepatic impairment reduced everolimus clearance by 53% and doubled AUC; dose should be halved with therapeutic monitoring.

View source on PubMed (PMID 11719728) ↗

Sample size
16 (8 hepatic impairment, 8 healthy controls)
Population
Subjects with moderate hepatic impairment (liver cirrhosis, Child-Pugh 7-9) and demographically matched healthy controls
Dosing
Single oral 2-mg dose
Duration
Single-dose study
Route
oral
Blinding
open_label
Controls
active_comparator
Drug class
mTOR inhibitor

Measured endpoints

  • Apparent clearance of everolimusDecreasedhepatic
    significanteffect: 53% reduction (9.1 +/- 3.1 versus 19.4 +/- 5.8 L/h)
  • Area under the blood concentration-time curve (AUC)Increasedhepatic
    significanteffect: 115% higher (245 +/- 91 versus 114 +/- 45 ng.h/ml)
  • Half-life of everolimusIncreasedhepatic
    significanteffect: 84% prolonged (79 +/- 42 versus 43 +/- 18 hours)
  • Maximum blood concentration (Cmax)No changehepatic
    not_significant
  • Time to reach Cmax (tmax)No changehepatic
    not_significant
  • Protein binding of everolimusNo changehepatic
    not_significanteffect: 73.8% +/- 3.6% versus 73.5% +/- 2.4%
  • Correlation of AUC with bilirubin levelIncreasedhepatic
    significanteffect: r = 0.86
  • Correlation of AUC with albumin concentrationDecreasedhepatic
    significanteffect: r = 0.72 (negative)
  • Routine safety assessmentsNo changesafety
    not_reported
Full abstract

We assessed the influence of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of the immunosuppressant everolimus to provide dose recommendations for clinical use. In this open-label, single-dose, case-control study, 8 subjects with liver cirrhosis classed as moderate hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh score, 7-9) and 8 demographically matched healthy control subjects received a single oral 2-mg dose of everolimus. Routine safety assessments were made, and blood samples were taken for determination of everolimus concentrations and protein binding. The apparent clearance of everolimus was significantly reduced by 53% in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment compared with healthy subjects (9.1 +/- 3.1 versus 19.4 +/- 5.8 L/h). This was manifested by a 115% higher area under the blood concentration-time curve (AUC) (245 +/- 91 versus 114 +/- 45 ng. h/ml) and 84% prolonged half-life (79 +/- 42 versus 43 +/- 18 hours) in subjects with hepatic impairment. The rate of absorption of everolimus was not altered by hepatic impairment on the basis of the maximum blood concentration (C(max)) and time to reach C(max) (t(max)). Protein binding was similar in the two groups (73.8% +/- 3.6% versus 73.5% +/- 2.4%). A significant positive correlation of the everolimus AUC with bilirubin level (r = 0.86) and a significant negative correlation with albumin concentration (r = 0.72) was observed. The dose of everolimus should initially be reduced by half in patients with mild and moderate hepatic impairment on the basis of the Child-Pugh classification. Therapeutic monitoring would be a helpful adjunct to subsequent titration of everolimus exposure in this subpopulation. Everolimus has not been assessed in patients with severe hepatic impairment.

Research information, not medical advice. StudyKit summarizes published studies to help you understand your protocol. It does not diagnose, treat, or replace a clinician. Talk to a qualified provider before changing anything you take.