Resistance Trainingobservational2016

Validity and reliability of a controlled pneumatic resistance exercise device.

Biomedical sciences instrumentation

confidence

Key findings

Pneumatic squat device validated for static and dynamic force control with R2=0.9997 and ICC=0.999; slew rate 749.3 N/s; future work needed for real-time control.

View source on PubMed (PMID 19141892) ↗

Sample size
Not reported
Population
Not applicable (engineering validation study of a pneumatic resistance exercise device)
Dosing
Not applicable
Duration
Not reported
Route
Not applicable
Blinding
not_reported
Controls
not_reported
Drug class
exercise modality
Full abstract

During the concentric portion of the free-weight squat exercise, accelerating the mass from rest results in a fluctuation in ground reaction force. It is characterized by an initial period of force greater than the load while accelerating from rest followed by a period of force lower than the external load during negative acceleration. During the deceleration phase, less force is exerted and muscles are loaded sub-optimally. Thus, using a reduced inertia form of resistance such as pneumatics has the capability to minimize these inertial effects as well as control the force in real time to maximize the force exerted over the exercise cycle. To improve the system response of a preliminary design, a squat device was designed with a reduced mass barbell and two smaller pneumatic cylinders. The resistance was controlled by regulating cylinder pressure such that it is capable of adjusting force within a repetition to maximize force exerted during the lift. The resistance force production of the machine was statically validated with the input voltage and output force R2 =0.9997 for at four increments of the range of motion, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between trials at the different heights equaled 0.999. The slew rate at three forces was 749.3 N/s +/- 252.3. Dynamic human subject testing showed the desired input force correlated with average and peak ground reaction force with R2 = 0.9981 and R2 = 0.9315, respectively. The ICC between desired force and average and peak ground reaction force was 0.963. Thus, the system is able to deliver constant levels of static and dynamic force with validity and reliability. Future work will be required to develop the control strategy required for real-time control, and performance testing is required to determine its efficacy.

Research information, not medical advice. StudyKit summarizes published studies to help you understand your protocol. It does not diagnose, treat, or replace a clinician. Talk to a qualified provider before changing anything you take.