NAD+observational2016

Predicted Role of NAD Utilization in the Control of Circadian Rhythms during DNA Damage Response.

PLoS computational biology

confidence

Key findings

Computational model proposes NAD competition between SIRT1 and PARP1 during DNA damage may drive circadian phase advancement; no clinical/biological endpoints reported.

View source on PubMed (PMID 26020938) ↗

Sample size
N/A
Population
In silico model (computational simulation)
Dosing
N/A
Duration
N/A
Route
N/A
Blinding
not_reported
Controls
none
Drug class
coenzyme
Full abstract

The circadian clock is a set of regulatory steps that oscillate with a period of approximately 24 hours influencing many biological processes. These oscillations are robust to external stresses, and in the case of genotoxic stress (i.e. DNA damage), the circadian clock responds through phase shifting with primarily phase advancements. The effect of DNA damage on the circadian clock and the mechanism through which this effect operates remains to be thoroughly investigated. Here we build an in silico model to examine damage-induced circadian phase shifts by investigating a possible mechanism linking circadian rhythms to metabolism. The proposed model involves two DNA damage response proteins, SIRT1 and PARP1, that are each consumers of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD), a metabolite involved in oxidation-reduction reactions and in ATP synthesis. This model builds on two key findings: 1) that SIRT1 (a protein deacetylase) is involved in both the positive (i.e. transcriptional activation) and negative (i.e. transcriptional repression) arms of the circadian regulation and 2) that PARP1 is a major consumer of NAD during the DNA damage response. In our simulations, we observe that increased PARP1 activity may be able to trigger SIRT1-induced circadian phase advancements by decreasing SIRT1 activity through competition for NAD supplies. We show how this competitive inhibition may operate through protein acetylation in conjunction with phosphorylation, consistent with reported observations. These findings suggest a possible mechanism through which multiple perturbations, each dominant during different points of the circadian cycle, may result in the phase advancement of the circadian clock seen during DNA damage.

Research information, not medical advice. StudyKit summarizes published studies to help you understand your protocol. It does not diagnose, treat, or replace a clinician. Talk to a qualified provider before changing anything you take.