Stem Cell Therapyreview2019

Fibroblasts as a practical alternative to mesenchymal stem cells.

Journal of translational medicine

confidence

Key findings

Review/concept paper discussing fibroblasts as a practical alternative to MSC in regenerative medicine; no clinical or biological endpoints reported.

View source on PubMed (PMID 30053821) ↗

Sample size
Not reported
Population
Not applicable (review/concept paper)
Dosing
Not reported
Duration
Not reported
Route
Not reported
Blinding
not_reported
Controls
not_reported
Drug class
regenerative therapy
Full abstract

Mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) therapy offers great potential for treatment of disease through the multifunctional and responsive ability of these cells. In numerous contexts, MSC have been shown to reduce inflammation, modulate immune responses, and provide trophic factor support for regeneration. While the most commonly used MSC source, the bone marrow provides relatively little starting material for cellular expansion, and requires invasive extraction means, fibroblasts are easily harvested in large numbers from various biological wastes. Additionally, in vitro expansion of fibroblasts is significantly easier given the robustness of these cells in tissue culture and shorter doubling time compared to typical MSC. In this paper we put forward the concept that in some cases, fibroblasts may be utilized as a more practical, and potentially more effective cell therapy than mesenchymal stem cells. Anti-inflammatory, immune modulatory, and regenerative properties of fibroblasts will be discussed in the context of regenerative medicine.

Research information, not medical advice. StudyKit summarizes published studies to help you understand your protocol. It does not diagnose, treat, or replace a clinician. Talk to a qualified provider before changing anything you take.