Ivermectinobservational2023

Off-label drug use during the COVID-19 pandemic in Africa: topic modelling and sentiment analysis of ivermectin in South Africa and Nigeria as a case study.

Journal of the Royal Society, Interface

confidence

Key findings

Qualitative analysis of public sentiment and topics around ivermectin use for COVID-19; no clinical or biological endpoints reported.

View source on PubMed (PMID 37700708) ↗

Sample size
Not reported
Population
Public Twitter users in Nigeria and South Africa discussing ivermectin for COVID-19
Dosing
Not reported
Duration
Not reported
Route
Not reported
Blinding
not_reported
Controls
none
Drug class
antiparasitic
Full abstract

Although rejected by the World Health Organization, the human and even veterinary formulation of ivermectin has widely been used for prevention and treatment of COVID-19. In this work we leverage Twitter to understand the reasons for the drug use from ivermectin supporters, their source of information, their emotions, their gender demographics, and location information, in Nigeria and South Africa. Topic modelling is performed on a Twitter dataset gathered using keywords 'ivermectin' and 'ivm'. A model is fine-tuned on RoBERTa to find the stance of the tweets. Statistical analysis is performed to compare the stance and emotions. Most ivermectin supporters either redistribute conspiracy theories posted by influencers, or refer to flawed studies confirming ivermectin efficacy in vitro. Three emotions have the highest intensity, optimism, joy and disgust. The number of anti-ivermectin tweets has a significant positive correlation with vaccination rate. All the provinces in South Africa and most of the provinces of Nigeria are pro-ivermectin and have higher disgust polarity. This work makes the effort to understand public discussions regarding ivermectin during the COVID-19 pandemic to help policy-makers understand the rationale behind its popularity, and inform more targeted policies to discourage self-administration of ivermectin. Moreover, it is a lesson to future outbreaks.

Research information, not medical advice. StudyKit summarizes published studies to help you understand your protocol. It does not diagnose, treat, or replace a clinician. Talk to a qualified provider before changing anything you take.